Co-Founder Reset Programme

Structured support for co-founders to work through tension, clarify expectations and agree a workable way forward

The Reset Programme helps co-founders surface the real issues, work through conflict with structure, and agree a more realistic way forward, whether that means repair, reset, redesign, or separation.

When this is the right route

This programme is designed for co-founders who know the problem is reaching make-or-break. They feel it’s too late to apply proactive Alignment & Governance activities and want a structured process rather than more avoidance, blame or unproductive debate.

  • You are having the same conflict in different forms.
  • Roles, contribution, pay, effort, or authority no longer feel workable.
  • Trust has weakened and the tension is affecting decisions or execution.
  • You’ve improved the business operating system and things still feel stuck.
  • One or a number of founders are questioning whether the partnership can continue.
  • The strain is starting to affect the company, the team, investors, or clients

The aim is not to force harmony or rush to a legal solution. It is to create an environment in which both people can think more clearly, speak more honestly and reach decisions they can actually use. The work is designed to create momentum, not add administration. – If the same issue keeps returning, the problem is usually not a lack of goodwill. It is the absence of a safe, structured way to address what is underneath it.

If only one founder is ready to engage, start with the Co-Founder Clarity Session instead.

What the Reset Programme helps with

The Reset Programme is a structured process for co-founders who need help addressing what has become difficult to resolve on their own. It combines private reflection, guided analysis, and facilitated conversations so that the real issues can be surfaced and worked through without the discussion collapsing into blame, avoidance, or endless repetition.

Better conversation

Co-founder conflict and communication breakdown

Shared Alignment

Founder alignment around roles, priorities and decision-making

Managing conflict

Business partner conflict that is affecting the company, the team or momentum.

Roadmap

Founder transitions, reduced involvement or separation planning

Productivity

Rebuilding enough trust to continue working together productively

Some co-founders come to this because they want to resolve their pain quickly. Others come because they are at a turning point and want to avoid making things worse. In both cases, the work is practical, structured and focused on what needs to happen next.

How the Reset Program works

A safer way to deal with difficult co-founder issues

Not every important concern is easy to say out loud at the start. That is why the Reset process begins with private reflection, giving each co-founder space to privately organise their thinking before joint conversations begin. – We review both your business and personal operating systems.

I use Joze.ai as part of that early reflection process. Joze is a platform built for human alignment and conflict resolution, designed by an attorney. It supports more effective workflows without replacing human judgment. Using patent-pending sentiment analysis, the platform instantly calculates your objective percentage of agreement to reveal hidden common ground. It displays localized, contextual legal considerations relevant to those specific options based on your geography and your topic (e.g., contract amendment requirements, equity assignment rules, or landlord consent laws). This enables founders to understand the legal landscape before voting so they don’t agree to something structurally unfeasible.

I use cofounder AI here as a support tool, not as a substitute for judgment, facilitation or care. It helps create a more private and thoughtful starting point, especially when concerns are sensitive, emotions are high, or one or both founders need help getting clear before speaking together.

The whole process can be conducted asynchronously, enabling you and your partners time to reflect and consider your position. It’s not restricted to office hours so we can work quickly. – No more high-pressure shuttle mediation situations.

Guided by my human expertise as your Sherpa, this process transforms months of slow, conventional mediation into a clear, actionable agreement in just days. My role is not to take sides; it is to help you understand the real issues, improve the quality of the conversation and reach an outcome that protects both the people and the business.

1. Private input

Each founder reflects and conributes separately so concerns, assumptions, and sticking points can be surfaced before joint discussion

2. Diagnostic mapping

The core tensions, patterns, risks, and possible routes forward are clarified

3. Facilitated conversations

The difficult issues are addressed directly, with structure and support. Potential scenarios are designed and voted on

4. Agreements and next steps

The work ends with practical actions, clearer agreements, or a defined transition path

What founders leave with

This is not just a space to get it off your chest. This is not about deciding who is right. It is a practical, confidential process to restore clarity, address difficult decisions and protect the business. It’s about understanding yourself and your co-founders better. It helps co-founders reach useful clarity and practical agreements they can work from.

  • Better understanding of what is actually driving the conflict
  • Clearer language for discussing difficult issues without immediately escalating them
  • Practical agreements on roles, decision-making, communication, contribution, boundaries etc.
  • A clearer view of whether the partnership can be repaired, reset, redesigned, or brought to an end.
  • A short action plan or transition roadmap for what happens next

You do not need to persuade your co-founder that they are the problem. The starting point is a neutral conversation about what the partnership and business need now. The aim is not simply to have a better conversation. It is to leave with clearer decisions, stronger working agreements, and a more stable basis for running the business, or ending the partnership with less collateral damage.

In some situations, one of the outputs may be a practical agreement summary that is broadly equivalent to heads of terms: a clear record of what has been agreed in principle about roles, responsibilities, decision-making, working expectations, ownership questions, transition arrangements or separation steps.

Where formal legal documentation is needed, that practical summary can then be taken to a solicitor as a clearer starting point for the next stage. This helps reduce ambiguity and means professional advisers are working from an agreed framework rather than from two conflicting accounts.

What this is not

The Reset Programme is not legal advice, therapy or formal mediation. Where legal implementation is needed, it should sit with the appropriate solicitor or adviser. The Co-Counder Reset Programme is

  • Not a substitute for legal advice.
  • Not a substitute for tax or financial advice.
  • Not therapy.
  • Not a promise that the co-founder relationship will continue in its current form.

Sometimes the best outcome is renewed alignment. Sometimes it is a more realistic reset. Sometimes it is a better-managed separation. The goal is not a scripted ending; it is a better one.

If only one founder is ready to act, the best starting point is usually the Clarity Session. That creates a safe first step and can make it easier to involve the other person later.

Do not let founder conflict keep running the business

If the issue is already affecting trust, decisions, or the future of the partnership, structured intervention is more effective than another round of circular conversation.

Where continuing together is no longer right, I help founders reach a fair, workable and business-protective exit—not a drawn-out private war.

Reset Programme Investment

Co-founder conflict is widely cited as one of the most common reasons startups fail. The cost is rarely limited to the relationship itself; it shows up in slower decisions, reduced trust, distracted execution, and growing uncertainty for the wider business.

What goes unnamed at founder level rarely stays contained for long.

Stage one

Onboarding, Asynchronous Interviews, Conflict Analysis & Topic Consolidation
£350 per party

Stage two

Negotiation Cycles, Conclusion & Action Plan, depending on complexity
Between £250 and £750 per party

Frequently asked questions

If you want a quick introduction on how to prevent issues arising

Introduction to relationship governance and how to get into good habits

If you are a growing or out-of-sync co-founder team

Strengthen the relationship, clarify expectations, and put better governance around the partnership before strain escalates during a 10 week programme.

If you are stuck and need private clarity first, or your co-founder won’t come to the table

Start with a confidential session to understand the real issue, test your instincts, and decide what to do next.

The Distance Between Us: Rebuilding Co-Founder Trust, Resolving Conflict or Ending the Partnership with Dignity

A practical guide for co-founders when the relationship is under strain.

Scroll to Top